A Quick Test on 6 Citation Databases
Why does Google Scholar show higher citation counts than Scopus and Web of Science? What tools are better for tracing citations in fields outside of science and engineering?
Why does Google Scholar show higher citation counts than Scopus and Web of Science? What tools are better for tracing citations in fields outside of science and engineering?
You are probably familiar with using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to find citations between scholarly works. This week, we look at alternative citation indices that are also powerful, and free to use!
A smart city uses innovation and technology to address urban challenges, improve the effectiveness of public services, make the city more liveable and sustainable. To achieve these, open data is an essential foundation.
As a researcher, sometimes you may need to share your data to meet publishers’ or funders’ requirement, but the process of preparing your data can be tedious and time-consuming. In this regard, DataSpace@HKUST can help.
Library Research Support Services recently did a small-scale study to learn about the text and data mining (TDM) policies of some of our databases. We found that most of them allow TDM under certain conditions.
In August 2020, arXiv announced its entire corpus consisting 1.7 million scholarly articles is available as a free dataset on Kaggle.
Different people and groups in the research community are working on making data management plan (DMP) machine-actionable.
Different from Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract meaning from research literature. It helps researchers to explore literature in a new way.
With just one click, you can find out how many papers Hong Kong has published from 1996-2018, citations per document, the H Index and world ranking.
CORD-19 is a free dataset with over 45,000 scholarly articles about COVID-19 and related coronavirus to support researchers in fighting against the pandemic.